LOCAL NEWS THAT MATTERS, SENT TO YOU DIRECTLY. SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE!
The Peace Tower on Parliament Hill is seen from Major's Hill Park in Ottawa, on Sunday, Sept. 20, 2026. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Keito Newman

MPs to hold first vote on federal government’s key economic bill C-39

Oct 8, 2026 | 9:26 AM

OTTAWA — The federal government’s contentious legislation to speed up major projects and reduce the number of labour disruptions is scheduled to come up for its first vote in the House of Commons Thursday.

The vote will decide if Bill C-39 moves forward for further study at a House of Commons committee. The Liberals now have a majority of seats so the bill is expected to pass.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government has said it plans to strike a special committee to study the sweeping legislation. The exact makeup of that committee has not been announced.

NDP House leader Don Davies said he asked the government to allow his party to participate in that committee but Government House leader Steven MacKinnon turned him down.

“We think that the Liberals know that if New Democrats are on the special committee that we will be nominating witnesses, we will ask questions, we’ll be moving amendments, we will be raising issues that you’ve heard mentioned here that they don’t want raised. And I think that’s fundamentally undemocratic,” Davies said.

A spokesperson for MacKinnon’s office said they won’t be commenting on the matter.

The NDP does not have recognized party status in the House of Commons and does not take part in regular standing committees because its caucus has fewer than 12 members.

At a press conference Thursday with labour and First Nations leaders, Davies and NDP Leader Avi Lewis said the legislation must not pass as written because of its effects on labour and treaty rights.

Lewis said the bill “must be scrapped” because of the massive changes it would unleash and because the government failed to consult adequately with Indigenous groups and others affected by the legislation.

On Tuesday, B.C. Liberal MP Patrick Weiler took some shots at his own government’s bill during debate in the House of Commons.

Weiler said that while he agrees with the overall direction of the bill, he’s not comfortable with C-39 giving cabinet the power to fast-track project timelines. He also warned the one-year project timelines under the bill could undermine the government’s duty to consult with Indigenous communities.

Lewis said Weiler took a “courageous stand” and he’s heard similar concerns from Liberal voters on the doorstep.

“There are people in the progressive Liberal universe who are dismayed by this legislation and I encourage more of them to speak up before it’s too late,” Lewis said.

Chief Shelly Moore-Frappier, of the Teme Augama Anishinabek nation, told the press conference her community is not anti-development but this legislation must not pass as written.

She said she wants to see the bill amended to compel the government to obtain Indigenous consent for developments, to eliminate the legislation’s deadlines on consultation, and to require companies to clean up former industrial sites.

“Last year I told the Senate that Bill C-5 was economic coercion. Ottawa used the threat of tariffs to push First Nations into line, and we got painted as the problem. We were told the fast-track was temporary. C-39 takes it and makes it permanent,” Moore-Frappier said.

“Ottawa draws a line around an area and calls it a region of national interest, and every project inside it gets sped up. But designating a region isn’t the same as getting our consent.”

She said her community is home to deposits of copper, cobalt, platinum and other critical minerals — along with inactive mines that have been left unremediated.

The government insists it will uphold its duty to consult with Indigenous groups on projects and argues the legislation does not threaten the right to strike.

The legislation also proposes new rules on when the jobs minister can intervene in a labour dispute affecting a federally regulated sector.

At a separate press conference later in the day, labour leaders called C-39 an attack on workers’ rights.

Bea Bruske, president of the Canadian Labour Congress, said changes that clarify a minister’s power to scuttle a work stoppage when the “national interest” is at stake completely undermine unions’ ability to use the threat of a strike to extract gains at the bargaining table.

“If the minister determines that there’s an economic impact, it can automatically mean that workers do not have the right … to walk off the job,” she said.

Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu has said the federal government will not compromise workers’ rights to strike, but she did not answer directly when asked at the Senate earlier this week whether the bill could impose limits on that right.

The Liberals argue changes proposed to the Canada Labour Code in the bill will put “guardrails” on the minister’s ability to intervene in labour negotiations.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 8, 2026.

David Baxter and Craig Lord, The Canadian Press