Is a Bighorn Park what we want?
As we approach the potential announcement of a Bighorn Wildland Park West of Rocky Mountain House, I can’t help but wonder how we get this far without any studies specifically examining the sustainability of the Bighorn Public Land Use Zones (PLUZ) as they are currently managed. As far as I can tell, this hasn’t been done.
There is no report indicating that OHV use and random camping are not sustainable at current levels, there is no report on deteriorating water quality and there are no reports presented that indicate fish and wildlife populations in this area are declining. What I see are feel good statements about preserving nature from conservation groups like CPAWS, Y2Y and Alberta Preserves. Of course, I want to see nature preserved, but I’m concerned that by pushing through the Bighorn Park current users are going to be displaced when they don’t need to be, nor deserve to be.
If you look at the way these lands are managed under the current Bighorn PLUZ regulations they are highly restrictive. There has been a steering committee in place for more than 15 years that has debated conservation measures to ensure the sustainability of these lands. In fact, this has worked so well that conservation groups, such as CPAWS, have outright indicated the Bighorn is a “relatively intact landscape.”
I am not completely against the creation of a Wildland Park, but I believe it’s unnecessary given how well the PLUZ regulations have worked and I am concerned that well-meaning individuals with little attachment to the social fabric of the region will determine regulations that affect long-term local users. My greatest concerns and I believe the concerns of most local users are that random camping and OHV use will be discontinued. The current system has worked well and with minor modifications can be improved to ensure long-term sustainability.