Canada’s lobby for tariff relief: from Ottawa, to DC, practically to outer space

“I essentially voiced the position of the government of Canada… that we did not see any reason to include Canada in this,” Garneau said in an interview Friday.

Garneau described Ross’s reply: ”He said, to use his words, ‘There will be an opportunity to petition.’”

It’s been going on like this for a year.

The Canadian government began pressing for relief since it became clear in early 2017 that the U.S. was considering invoking the excuse of national security to impose tariffs, a rarely used weapon in trade policy that has prompted fears of a historic trade war.

Trudeau has raised it several times with Trump, and just discussed it last week with a senior U.S. military figure visiting the prime minister’s Parliament Hill office. His aide Gerald Butts and Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland have been working business leaders. Finance Minister Bill Morneau has pressed his American counterpart Steve Mnuchin. Several officials have raised it with U.S. ambassador Kelly Craft.

Numerous Americans have also argued Canada’s case.

While the final details won’t be known until next week, Trump has evinced a damn-the-torpedoes attitude: ”Trade wars are good, and easy to win,” the president tweeted Friday, arguing that the U.S. import-export deficit means it can afford to slow global trade.

That’s despite a push from his own allies — past and present U.S. military figures, a usually Trump-friendly editorial board, a supportive union, fellow Republicans and even companies that would otherwise benefit from tariffs.

All have urged Trump not to impose them on the U.S.’s No. 1 seller: Canada.

That includes the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal. Normally a Trump cheering corner, the opinion section of the pro-business newspaper ran an editorial titled, “Trump’s tariff folly: his tax on aluminum and steel will hurt the economy and his voters.”

It noted that Canada supplies more steel to the U.S. by orders of magnitude than China — the supposed target of this tariff.

”The tariffs will whack that menace to world peace known as Canada, which supplies 16 per cent (of U.S. steel imports),” said the paper.

”Mr. Trump is punishing our largest trading partner in the middle of a NAFTA renegotiation that he claims will result in a much better deal. Instead he is taking a machete to America’s trade credibility. Why should Canada believe a word he says?”

Trump is hearing the same from the military.

The ostensible excuse for these tariffs is that foreign steel undermines U.S. national security, making emergency measures legitimate. His administration has indeed declared it a security issue, and Trump says he’s leaning toward bigger penalties than many expected — a 25 per cent global tariff on steel and 10 per cent on aluminum.

But Trump’s own defence secretary, James Mattis, undermined the case for tariffs in a letter released several days ago. He said the military had more than enough steel for its needs, expressed concern broad tariffs would hurt key allies, and urged that any tariffs be narrowly focused.

The administration has been hearing this for months.

As it prepared its national-security study, witness after witness suggested Canada be exempted like it was from U.S. steel actions in the early 2000s and 1980s. Meanwhile, not one witness specifically called for tariffs on the northern neighbour.

A retired U.S. army brigadier-general, John Adams, an expert on the defence-industrial complex, testified that he supported tariffs, with one exception: ”The one supplier in whom I have complete confidence is Canada.” He added that Canada should bolster its monitoring of dumped imports.

Two of the people in the room with Trump when he announced his tariffs Thursday, and who mostly support his action, expressed similar pro-Canada views.

One of them, Michael Bless, chief executive of Century Aluminum Co., said in his submission to the U.S. government: ”As a contiguous, friendly neighbour, Canada is a safe and reliable source of supply. In Century’s view, (these penalties) can be effective without applying it to Canada.”

Other companies made such submissions to the U.S. government.

Bob Prusak, chief executive of Magnitude 7 Metals, testified that he opposed sanctions relief for anyone — “other than Canada.”

Alexander Panetta, The Canadian Press

by Canadian Press

Canada’s lobby for tariff relief: from Ottawa, to DC, practically to outer space

What's Trending