Industry group warns Ottawa that excessive cuts to drug prices could be harmful

“Maybe it’s something the industry can absorb. And maybe it will be without a huge bump. But from everything we’ve seen, it’s set up to be very, very significant and that’s what our concern is.”

In a review in May by then-federal health minister Jane Philpott, she pledged to take action to bring down “unacceptably high drug costs.”

Fralick said the Innovative Medicines group — whose members account for a majority of Canada’s drug research spending — understands that prices need to be lowered.

“But we also want (Canada) to continue to be a strong player in the innovative world, in the broader pharmaceutical world,” Fralick said.

During a question period following her speech, Fralick said a big change in pricing “will mean job loss. It will mean less resourcing for research. It will mean less support for patient programs. . . . How much, I can’t say.”

According to an Ernst & Young report commissioned by the industry group, members of Innovative Medicines Canada collectively support 30,000 jobs in Canada through their activities — either directly or indirectly.

The E&Y report, released Tuesday, estimates members spent $1.2 billion in 2016 on various types of research including clinical trials, funding for Canada Research Chairs and vaccine manufacturing facilities.

By that broad measure of research, the E&Y report calculates the group’s members spent 9.97 per cent of their 2016 gross revenues on R&D — about double the 4.9 per cent recognized by a government analysis released last week.

Fralick said it was a coincidence that the E&Y estimate is close to the 10 per cent commitment made by the industry when the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board was established in 1987.

The PMPRB’s own annual report, issued Oct. 27, says the Innovative Medicines group of companies haven’t met the 10 per cent threshold since 2002 and their spending as a percentage of gross level has been about five per cent since 2013.

Fralick said the difference between the two estimates is because the government only counts research spending through a government program known as Scientific Research and Experimental Development, or SR&ED (pronounced “shred”).

The release of the E&Y report and presentation at the Economic Club’s Ottawa meeting on Tuesday is part of the group’s efforts to get its message out before Health Canada officials make their recommendations for a revamped price-review board — expected to be posted in the Canada Gazette this month.

Fralick said her understanding is that the government wants to get through the public consultation process in time to have new regulations in place by the end of 2018 and implemented by 2019, so Innovative Medicines has pushed to present its position before the proposed changes are published in the Canada Gazette.

“They will still make the decisions that they want to but we want it to be as informed as possible. And they’ve been very open, of late, to getting special briefings from us on the report and we’ll be able to share more with them in those special sessions.”

— by David Paddon in Toronto.

The Canadian Press

by Canadian Press

Industry group warns Ottawa that excessive cuts to drug prices could be harmful

What's Trending