As Trump fumes, senators bid to protect the special counsel

The raid was overseen by the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan and was based in part on a referral from Mueller, said Cohen’s lawyer, Stephen Ryan.

Graham said in a statement that the purpose of the bill is to ensure a special counsel isn’t fired for political reasons.

“I think this will serve the country well,” he said.

Coons said it’s time for Republicans and Democrats to “stand up and make it clear that we are committed to the rule of law in this country.”

After introducing similar bills in August, when Trump first began criticizing Mueller’s investigation, Tillis and Graham kept quiet for months about the need for the legislation while Democrats continued to push it. The two GOP senators said they didn’t think Trump would really move to fire Mueller. But the four senators — all members of the Senate Judiciary Committee — moved to push out a new, combined bill in the hours after Trump’s tirade Monday.

Some Republicans still say they see no need for the legislation.

“I don’t think it’s necessary,” said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, said after the legislation was introduced. “And if it did pass, would the president sign it? I think it’s unlikely that he would.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has similarly shown little interest, saying Tuesday he doesn’t think Mueller will be fired.

Still, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, told reporters Wednesday the legislation is expected to come up for a committee vote, possibly as soon as next week. He said in the past he wanted the two bills to be reconciled before the committee could consider it.

Now that has happened, Grassley said he has “some obligation to move along with it.”

According to a Republican committee aide, Grassley is also preparing an amendment to the bill. According to the aide, the amendment would require Congress to be notified prior to the removal of a special counsel with a significant lead time. It would also require new reports to Congress if the scope of the special counsel’s investigation changes and a final report on the investigation with a detailed explanation of any charges.

The aide declined to be named because the amendment has not yet been introduced.

The top Democrat on the committee, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, is already expressing concerns about the amendment, even though she says she has not yet seen it. In a statement, Feinstein said it “could undermine the investigation.”

No similar legislation has moved in the House. Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., made a comment similar to McConnell’s Wednesday, saying he doesn’t think Mueller will be fired.

“I have assurances that it’s not because I’ve been talking to people in the White House about it,” Ryan said.

The legislation would write into law existing Justice Department regulations that say a special counsel can only be fired for good cause by an senior Justice official. And the expedited review would determine whether the special counsel was fired for good cause.

As the current regulations stand, any dismissal for cause would have to be carried out by Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller in May 2017 and has repeatedly expressed support for him.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders appeared to challenge the existing regulations on Tuesday, telling reporters that Trump “certainly believes he has the power” to fire Mueller, though he isn’t taking that step now.

___

Associated Press writers Lisa Mascaro in Washington and David Pitt in Des Moines, Iowa, contributed to this report.

Mary Clare Jalonick, The Associated Press

by Canadian Press

As Trump fumes, senators bid to protect the special counsel

What's Trending