Pentagon misconduct complaints increase; fewer found guilty

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Bluesky
• Share on X
• Copy Link

Fine told the House panel that just two whistleblower cases charging a senior official with retribution were substantiated in the 2017 fiscal year, compared to three in each of the two previous years. Whistleblower cases usually allege that an officer or superior has retaliated against a lower ranking service member or worker for making some type of complaint.

In support of Red Deer teen

Stand Together Against Bullying gathering set for Wednesday

Jun 19, 2026

Heavy rain through the weekend

Rainfall warning issued for communities north of Red Deer

Jun 19, 2026

additional leased parking

City of Lacombe expands downtown parking capacity

Jun 19, 2026

According to Fine, the number of retribution complaints filed against senior officials increased from 145 to 165 over the past five years. But, more broadly, complaints against all department individuals jumped by nearly 80 per cent over that same time period.

“Whistleblower reprisal has skyrocketed because of the misuse and misapplication of whistleblower reprisal against senior officials. It is off the charts,” Lt. Gen. David Quantock, the Army’s inspector general, told the committee, noting that just 4 per cent of the Army cases are substantiated. He said the complaints are often made by a soldier or civilian after they have been held accountable for misconduct or poor performance.

“The resulting claim of reprisal creates challenges for senior commanders who hold people accountable, and then are faced with an inspector general whistleblower reprisal investigation,” he said.

Fine said that he is hiring a fulltime whistleblower ombudsman to help make sure troops and workers understand their rights and responsibilities and to help prevent reprisals.

Lawmakers raised concerns about whether military investigators can effectively cast judgment on officers in their own service, and they questioned whether civilians should do those jobs. They also asked if offenders are treated equally across the services — or if officers might be disciplined differently for the same offence depending on what service they belong to.

Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., said she’s concerned that lower-ranking service members are treated more harshly for violations than senior officers are.

“There is a phrase in the military that goes like this, ‘Different spanks for different ranks,’” she said. “Many senior leaders who should be the essential core of the chain of command are not being held to the same standard as the rank and file. This corrupts fairness, justice and morale.”

Fine said only a small minority of senior leaders are guilty of misconduct. He added that the IG’s office is looking into ways to help standardize investigations and also track and record cases in similar ways.

The inspectors general also told the committee that they are understaffed, have large backlogs, and it can often 200-400 days to investigate and complete a case.

Lolita C. Baldor, The Associated Press