What If?

I was amazed while I watched the city of Calgary rally around all those so devastated by the flood they had years ago. The spirit of community was much deeper and wider than those flood waters could ever be. It had ripples that travelled across the country. I remember how weird it looked to see those waters pouring into the downtown. You can hear about a flood but seeing it happen is a different story.

Of course, my line of work with homeless people made me think, “Wouldn’t it be so cool if we did that with all the homeless people?” Immediately my logic brain kicked in and I thought, “Well Hoffman, that’s ridiculous this is an entirely different situation! Those flood victims had no choice in the matter!”

But, is it really? Homeless is homeless. Losing everything is losing everything no matter the cause. Those losses are traumatic for anyone who experiences them.

One difference was the flood victims knew the whole of Canada was worried about their welfare and that they had millions of people empathizing with them. Donations came in by the millions, people came to help each other clean up, it was fantastic!

It made me wonder about the criterion that is needed for that kind of support across the board.

Can it be that level of concern and compassion is only doled out if people “deserve” it? Yet we know housing is not a right, it is a basic human need. You might argue that these flood victims were hard working citizens of their community. They contribute, they have families, they know how to behave and they make smarter choices in their lifestyles. Therein lays the issue. It looks for all intents and purposes that the folks we see on the streets are choosing their lifestyle. No one in their right mind would choose that. It can’t be that when they were a teenager they sat on the edge of their beds and said “I want to be addicted and live on the streets when I grow up.”

I think the answer is the “in their right mind” statement.

We have learned more about the working of the human brain in the last 20 years than in the 100 before that. We know now about the role that toxic stress plays on the developing brain. That means that brain chemistry plays a huge part in our understanding of addiction.

What if you start using a substance as a kid and find that it really helps you self-medicate that toxic stress?

What if your environment supported nothing but that?

Had I only heard about the flood in Calgary and didn’t see it, I would not have been as impacted. We watched that water, and it was so powerful. What if we could see the “flood” of trauma that surrounds all of those we serve at the Harbour? What if we grew up in the same environments they did? What if we saw the abuse? What if we felt the effects of a lifetime of chronic homelessness and addiction and disconnection? Would we respond differently? Would we still expect these people to get up and get to work? What if with the way their brains are currently working that the idea of choice is mute?

We know without a doubt that many of the people we serve at Safe Harbour have had a lifetime full of toxic stress and trauma, and have been unable to sustain the healthy connections we all need to survive. We know the effects of all of that on the developing brain and add toxic substances to that mix. So, if you are one of the unlucky ones who lived an environment full of toxic stress and your brain did not develop properly as a result… do you have a choice in the matter?

As Gabor Mate’ says in his book, “In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts”, “their brains didn’t stand a chance.

NOTE: The views expressed in this column do not necessarily represent those of rdnewsNOW or the Jim Pattison Broadcast Group. Column suggestions and letters to the editor can be sent to news@rdnewsNOW.com.

by Captain's Log

What If?

What's Trending