MP Calkins: Trudeau’s Prorogation of Parliament avoids accountability
Last week on Tuesday August 18 Justin Trudeau announced that he was proroguing Parliament.
Let me begin by saying that there is nothing inherently bad about prorogation. It can be a useful tool for a government to create a new session of a Parliament and come back with a Throne Speech to outline the next steps on fulfilling their mandate, or to signal a shift in priorities. While it isn’t especially common, the act of prorogation is a procedural tool that can be used effectively and legitimately by a government. The problem in this case is that Justin Trudeau has prorogued Parliament during a global pandemic and economic crisis in order to try and kill investigations into his repeated ethical lapses.
When Parliament is prorogued neither the House of Commons or the Senate can conduct business, committees are disbanded, and government bills that haven’t been passed yet die on the order paper and must be either abandoned, reintroduced, or in some cases reinstated.
August 26 was scheduled to be one of the rare opportunities that the Liberals were going to allow for Parliamentarians to ask questions of Ministers since they, with the support of the NDP, shut down regular Parliamentary sittings in May to avoid accountability and oversight during the pandemic. It wasn’t even going to be a proper sitting of the House of Commons, with the full rights, privileges and abilities that Opposition Members would usually have to hold the government to account, but due to the prorogation even that didn’t happen. While we may only be missing one day of Justin Trudeau’s fake Parliament, the Liberals real goal was to disband nearly all committees, including the ones that have been investigating the WE Scandal, until at least late September.


