Judicial council offers up courses for judges on handling sex assault cases

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Bluesky
• Share on X
• Copy Link

In one session, experienced jurists discuss “rape myths” and “stereotypes,” and how such myths can propagate “rapidly” during various stages of the judicial process.

jackpot!

Lacombe man wins $15 million

43m ago

Conditions as of June 23

Crops advancing well in central Alberta, though yellowing in cereals reported as wet weather continues

56m ago

This afternoon and evening

Severe thunderstorm watch issued for Red Deer and surrounding area

3h ago

Johanna Laporte, the director of communications for the council, said Canada has “extensive” training for judges on a range of issues and the website is intended to inform Canadians of how judges keep up to date with the law and social context.

“While the recent public debate about sexual assault training for judges has cast a light on the need for added transparency, Council’s main impetus was to showcase the breadth and depth of judicial education programming,” said Laporte.

“Many courses have elements of social context awareness and sexual assault law woven into them and Council hopes that visitors will see that these complex issues are discussed in a variety of settings — not just in a stand alone course.”

The question of how well-equipped judges in Canada are to handle sexual assault cases has been a hot topic in recent years.

In 2017, a Nova Scotia judge acquitted a Halifax cab driver at trial, suggesting that even an intoxicated woman can consent to sex.

And during a trial in 2014, Alberta judge Robin Camp — referring to the complainant as “the accused” — asked why she hadn’t resisted the alleged assault by keeping her “knees together.” Camp stepped down after the council recommended that he be removed from the bench. He was reinstated last May by the Law Society of Alberta.

The federal Liberal government has thrown its support behind a bill, currently before the Senate, that would require judges to take courses in sexual assault law.

Bill C-337 would also limit judicial appointments to those who have completed comprehensive education in sexual assault law and social context.

It would also require the council to report on continuing education seminars in matters related to sexual assault law and change the Criminal Code to require courts to provide written reasons in sexual assault decisions.

The bill was introduced in 2017 by former Conservative interim leader Rona Ambrose after Nova Scotia provincial court judge Gregory Lenehan acquitted Bassam Al-Rawi of sexual assault, even though police found the partially naked complainant unconscious in the back of Al-Rawi’s cab shortly after the alleged incident.

The ruling — along with Lenehan’s comment in his decision that “clearly, a drunk can consent” to sex — prompted widespread protest. Earlier this year, Nova Scotia’s top court ordered a new trial in the case.

Janice Dickson, The Canadian Press