Trump wants $108M for deeper ports; Corps adds $56M boost

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Bluesky
• Share on X
• Copy Link

But not every port left out of Trump’s budget request came away empty-handed. The Army Corps of Engineers, which oversees maintenance and construction on U.S. waterways, on Wednesday evening released its spending plan for discretionary funds recently approved by Congress.

all youths involved

Red Deer RCMP respond to downtown stabbing Friday night

Apr 19, 2026

addressing the "missing middle"

Hazlett Lake, west of QEII 'Centrepoint' developments could progress in not-too-distant future

Apr 18, 2026

Available for local businesses

Central Alberta First, RDP launch new Artificial Intelligence workshop series

Apr 17, 2026

That plan includes more than $56 million for five harbour-deepening projects, including $17.5 million for deepening to begin at the Port of Charleston, South Carolina, and the Port of Jacksonville, Florida. For projects still in the study and permitting phase, $2.8 million will go to Port Everglades in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and $557,000 for the Sabine-Neches waterway that serves three Texas ports.

The discretionary funds should give a guaranteed boost to the Army Corps’ chosen harbour projects. Trump’s proposed $4.1 trillion budget for fiscal 2018, meanwhile, faces a long and uncertain road in Congress.

“Now you’ve got the congressional money and you’re going to see what’s coming to you right now,” said Jim Walker, navigation policy director for the American Association of Port Authorities. “You may be a year away from seeing the (fiscal) 2018 money.”

The Port of Boston, where officials hope to start deepening the harbour later this year, may turn out to be the biggest winner. In additional to Trump’s $58 million request for the project, the Army Corps added $18.2 million in discretionary funding.

And while Trump’s request of $50 million for Savannah, the fourth-busiest U.S. container port, is 17 per cent more than President Barack Obama secured in his last budget, it’s still only half of what Georgia officials said was needed to keep the $973 million project on schedule.

Sen. Johnny Isakson, a Georgia Republican, said in a statement he was “disappointed by the failure of the Army Corps of Engineers” to route some of the discretionary funds to Savannah. He made no mention of Trump’s budget request.

“Rest assured that I will continue fighting in Congress to secure sufficient funding for this worthy project to be completed without further delays,” Isakson said.

Federal funding for deeper harbours proved tough to get under Obama as well. And while Congress gets the final say over the federal budget, the president’s recommendation on specific port projects still carries weight. That’s because a ban on so-called earmark spending adopted years ago prohibits lawmakers from inserting line items for their own pet projects.

Georgia ensured dredging of the Savannah River got started in 2015 by spending state taxpayers’ $266 million share upfront. South Carolina was prepared to do the same, with $300 million in state funding set aside to begin deepening the Charleston harbour this fall. The federal money from the Corps was welcomed.

“The significance of this funding for the timeline of our deepening project cannot be overstated — it is tremendous news for Charleston,” Jim Newsome, CEO of the South Carolina Ports Authority, said in a statement.

Russ Bynum, The Associated Press