Supreme Court decision says sexual history relevant in some cases

Supreme Court Justice Mary Moreau wrote in the unanimous decision that section 276 doesn’t categorically apply to those two offences and there are cases where evidence of sexual history is relevant.

Moreau said in this case, the evidence focused on the commercial aspect of the complainant’s prior sex work.

“While evidence of a complainant’s prior sex work should not be adduced to show a propensity to engage in sex work or sexual activity generally, such evidence may be relevant for other legitimate inferential purposes, as in the instant case,” Moreau said in the decision.

She said the evidence “related to the commercial nature of the complainant’s work, not its sexual nature, and it was being proffered to suggest that the complainant previously pursued work in the sex trade voluntarily, as opposed to being lured or exploited by the accused into working in the industry.”

Moreau said it’s the job of the courts to “balance the elimination of myths and stereotypes in sexual offence cases with the accused’s right to full answer and defence.”

In 2020, the two men were initially acquitted of human trafficking but were convicted of advertising, procuring and receiving material benefit from sexual services.

The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed their appeal and ordered a new trial on the sexual services offences in 2024. The Crown then appealed that decision to the Supreme Court.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 16, 2026.

— With files from Jim Bronskill

Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press

by The Canadian Press

Supreme Court decision says sexual history relevant in some cases

What's Trending