In this June 29, 2018, file photo, pipeline used to carry crude oil is shown at the Superior, Wis., terminal of Enbridge Energy. A significant permit has been granted to Enbridge's plan to replace its aging Line 3 oil pipeline across northern Minnesota. (AP Photo/Jim Mone)

By Associated Press

US$2.6-billion project

Minnesota gives final green light to Enbridge’s Line 3 project

Nov 30, 2020 | 4:10 PM

Minnesota regulators approved the final permit Monday for Enbridge’s Line 3 crude oil pipeline replacement across northern Minnesota, giving the company the green light to begin construction on the US$2.6-billion project.

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency granted a construction storm water permit for the project, which was the last hurdle that Calgary-based Enbridge needed to clear after years of reviews and court battles. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the independent Minnesota Public Utilities Commission gave their final approvals last week.

The company and its supporters welcomed the decision, but opponents have vowed to keep up their fight.

“Construction can now begin,” Enbridge spokeswoman Juli Kellner said in a statement that didn’t specify when that would happen.

But Enbridge has signalled that the start could be imminent. The company notified landowners along the route via letters earlier in the month that it expected construction to “start on approximately Nov. 30.” The company has previously said it expected the work to take about nine months.

funding boost

Red Deer Public Schools to add 11 classroom complexity teams

4h ago

Workers in demand

Skilled trades industry is on the rise in Alberta, according to Energy Job Shop

5h ago

Baragar’s District Intelligence

Red Deer Public enhances transparency with new platform

5h ago

“This is the culmination of six years of evidence and science-based review of the project,” Kellner said. “Line 3 is poised to provide significant economic benefits for counties, small businesses… (Indigenous) communities, and union members — bringing 4,200 family-sustaining, mostly local construction jobs, millions of dollars in local spending and additional tax revenues at a time when Northern Minnesota needs it most.”

But two tribes — the Red Lake and White Earth Bands of Chippewa — asked the PUC last week to stay its approval of the project, saying the influx of construction workers would put residents along the route at higher risk of COVID-19. A consolidated appeal by environmental and tribal groups is also pending before the Minnesota Court of Appeals.

Opponents say the project threatens spills in pristine waters where Indigenous people harvest wild rice and that the oilsands oil it plans to carry would aggravate climate change.

Enbridge said replacing the deteriorating pipeline, which was built in the 1960s and runs at only half its original capacity, is the best option for protecting the environment while meeting the region’s energy needs. The company said it has instituted strict coronavirus testing and screening protocols for workers to protect them and surrounding communities.

“Thousands of our friends and neighbours across Minnesota look forward to using their construction skills to protect our environment and communities by replacing an existing deteriorating pipeline,” Joel Smith, president of the Minnesota and North Dakota council of the Laborers’ International Union of North America.

Line 3 begins in Alberta and clips a corner of North Dakota before crossing Minnesota on its way to Enbridge’s terminal in Superior, Wis. The replacement segments in Canada, North Dakota and Wisconsin are already complete, leaving only the 542-kilometre stretch in Minnesota. Altogether Enbridge expects to spend US$2.9 billion on the U.S. portion.

“This project has faced years of scrutiny and unprecedented obstruction from Democrats and their allies,” Republican Minnesota House Minority Leader Kurt Daudt, of Crown, said in a statement. But he added that the process “ultimately” process worked.

“Let’s get to work on the Line 3 pipeline,” he said.

Alberta’s energy minister issued a statement Monday afternoon stating that she was pleased that the final green light has now been given to the project.

“The project’s approval is a win for Alberta — and for North American energy security. Canada and the U.S. have built the world’s strongest, most interdependent and trusted energy trading relationship,” said Sonia Savage.”

“Alberta has, and will continue to be, a stable, secure and responsible energy supplier to the U.S. Our relationship is even more important during these uncertain times as our continued energy partnership will be critical to the continent’s post-pandemic recovery.”

Savage went on to say that, “The $8.2-billion project will provide reliable energy, jobs and economic benefits for Canada and the United States. Replacing this almost 60-year-old pipeline will restore it to its original capacity of 760,000 barrels per day, adding about 370,000 barrels per day to Alberta’s current takeaway capacity.”

(Steve Karnowski – Associated Press)

(With file from Government of Alberta media release)