By Canadian Press

Supreme Court orders new trial over use of sexual history in Edmonton case

Jun 28, 2019 | 8:13 AM

OTTAWA — Canada’s top court says an Edmonton man shouldn’t have been able to tell a jury that he was in a “friends-with-benefits” relationship with an alleged sexual assault victim.

Patrick John Goldfinch was charged  in 2014 with assaulting a woman he once lived with, but was acquitted by a jury.

A complainant’s sexual history can’t ordinarily be used as evidence unless it’s directly relevant to the charge.

The trial judge allowed the information over concerns that jurors would have thought the relationship was platonic — a decision that the majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal disagreed with and ordered a new trial.

The Supreme Court of Canada agrees with the Alberta Court of Appeal, and is ordering a new trial.

"later is too late"

'Seniors for Climate' share message in Red Deer on International Day of Older Persons

4h ago

Elvis Stojko Headlines Stellar Cast

Stars on Ice coming to Red Deer

5h ago

Effective Immediately

Red Deer Regional Airport Authority appoints Nancy Paish as new CEO

6h ago

In a 6-1 ruling this morning, the court says the evidence was only used to suggest that the alleged victim was likely to consent to sex with Goldfinch because she had consented in the past, which isn’t allowed under the “rape-shield” law.

The Canadian Press