Splitting the ATA is all about payback and diminishing the profession
When it began life as the Alberta Teachers’ Alliance in 1917, the ATA had as one of its first policy objectives that the teaching profession should be fully self-regulating. The profession itself, through its professional organization, should set the requirements for certification and issue teaching certificates and set professional conduct and practice standards. In 1936, the William Aberhart government amended the Teaching Profession Act to grant the ATA legislative and regulatory authority for professional discipline, and these provisions have been revised, strengthened and expanded by the legislative assembly on multiple occasions since that time.
So why is Education Minister Adriana LaGrange now proposing to remove the Association’s legislated responsibility to establish and police professional conduct standards?
It’s all about payback and diminishing the role of teachers and the teaching profession. In the minister’s view, teachers can’t be trusted with these responsibilities. The minister does not see teachers as self-actualized professionals who are skilled practitioners and who maintain high standards. Teachers are technicians who need to be managed by their superiors. (Expect principals to be removed from the Association — they are managers, and management can’t be members of the bargaining unit.)
The education system should rely not on teachers but on management, which will direct the teacher technicians. And what are the views of teachers, who work every day with their students? The minister isn’t interested in what teachers think; management will tell the government what is best. For that matter, lessons can be created by management and distributed to teacher technicians to teach.


